I was thinking about to buy canon 70-200 f2.8 ii + 1.4x iii canon with canon 80d (I won the body now). It will give around 450mm (if I’m right) which is fine for me. Also sometime I can use portrait with f2.8. This is my hobby and I don’t earn any money from photography. I loved to take birds pictures and portraits sometime. Any suggestions Basically you need to track in the horizontal direction, but stabilize in the vertical direction -- that's what mode 2 does. This shot was taken with an EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM (original not the "II") using image stabilization mode 2. To get this shot, I slowed the shutter speed down to only 1/40th sec. What is the difference between Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM and Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. The essential telephoto lens for professional photography. A modern classic: this fast-aperture telephoto zoom lens is a favourite with photographers in virtually every genre. It’s now even better in bright light, and engineered to perform in the most challenging conditions. See full specification . Unless you are buying new, the 70-200 f2.8L II is perfectly fine. The only difference between the II and III is slightly different lens coating and the color of the white paint on the outside of the lens. The III does not take "better" photos. And yes, Waddizzle's point.. where you buy from can make all the difference in the world. Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD sample gallery: 61 images Jan 21, 2021 Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD sample gallery (DPReview TV) 46 images Jan 20, 2021 Sony 35mm F1.4 GM sample gallery (DPReview TV) 36 images uQIO. Get 5% more for your gear! Sell to our sponsor KEH: UPDATE: I just got the following specs from the Service Center: Max Magnification (at 35mm): ii: 0.22x. iii: 0.25x. Field of view: ii: 231 x 358 – 109 x 162mm. iii: 196 x 295 – 96 x 143mm. So there are in fact some obvious differences between the ii and iii, with the iii having more magnification and smaller FOV numbers. Compare Canon RF 70-200mm f 2.8 L IS USM Lens vs Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L IS II USM Lens vs Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L IS III USM Lens Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Even now I shoot at least 50% of my assignments wide open at f/2.8 with the 70-200 f/2.8L IS II--sports, portraits, news, events, galas, podium shots, details, etc. If I just shot outdoors and did lots of hiking, I'd probably get the f/4 version. But the f/2.8 70-200 is just too darn useful for my work. Canon’s 70-200mm II/III has long been one of the best lenses in terms of minimal focus breathing at close focus. The new Sigma 70-200mm Sport is right there with the Canon in the sample shots below. TDP 70-200L II with 1.4x TC III at 280mm vs 70-300L at 300mm. TDP 70-200L II with 2.0x TC III vs 100-400L at 400mm. I have also tried the version II 2x on the 70-200 and just find that combination to be unacceptable (yes I am VERY picky about the sharpness I get out of my lenses).

canon 70 200 f2 8 is ii vs iii